The Naming Commission's tactics are clear when they distort the ideas of Maury. His writings also challenge the idea of voluntary service.

Lee is under attack from all angles. Instead of clarifying for the public, the Commission adds to the pile. Can they get away with it?

Did any person on the Naming Commission fact check this claim? Maybe there is a reason they never listed the Colonels or cited a source!

The Naming Commission cannot rename assets for someone that served in the CSA involuntarily. So why won't they define what voluntary means?